At worst “intellectual property” produces nice paradoxes. Like this one: “Scientist has to pay to access his own paper“. The irony is thick when it turns out that when the paper left the scientist’s table, it was licensed with a Creative Commons license.
–
- Audio
- Books
- Kirjoja
- – 12 käsitettä maailmasta
- – Ajo ja jälki
- – Arktinen hekkuma
- – Elo ja anergia
- – Energia ja kokemus
- – Etiikan haasteet
- – Filosofian haasteet
- – Heidegger, Zizek ja vallankumous
- – Kaksijalkainen ympäristövallankumous
- – Karhun nimi
- – Koodi vapaaksi
- – Linkolan ajamana
- – Merkitys ja ala-aine
- – Otsikko uusiksi
- – Tuleva yliopisto
- Video
-
-
arkisto – archives
-
RSS Links
-
One Comment
In ancient Rome the publisher – the copier – did not pay the poet anything. If something was “printed” on paper – i.e. carved, copied, or written on a piece of material – that which was on that material was looked upon as belonging to the owner of that material. Thus, the poet starved.
Post a Comment