At worst “intellectual property” produces nice paradoxes. Like this one: “Scientist has to pay to access his own paper“. The irony is thick when it turns out that when the paper left the scientist’s table, it was licensed with a Creative Commons license.
- "The evidence shows that the science-society contract is broken." The writers conclude that #climate scientists sh… https://t.co/RqBNmoG4iq
- @jmkorhonen Mutta sitten on tapauksia, joissa yht.k./filosofia myös saapuu relativismiin/ei-klassisuuteen oman disi… https://t.co/Udt2Q0kUa4
- @jmkorhonen Tästä syystä fysiikan relativismi tai vielä paremmin kvantti-epävarmuus/komplemetaarisuus on usein radi… https://t.co/IxLFcuV4RL
-
One Comment
In ancient Rome the publisher – the copier – did not pay the poet anything. If something was “printed” on paper – i.e. carved, copied, or written on a piece of material – that which was on that material was looked upon as belonging to the owner of that material. Thus, the poet starved.
Post a Comment