At worst “intellectual property” produces nice paradoxes. Like this one: “Scientist has to pay to access his own paper“. The irony is thick when it turns out that when the paper left the scientist’s table, it was licensed with a Creative Commons license.
- @quinndupont @para_paramoney ping @jttrantala
- RT @biosresearch: Ekologisessa jälleenrakennuksessa yhteiskunnan aineellinen toiminta ja infrastruktuuri uudistuvat. Rinnalla tarvitaan #ku…
- RT @TimoHar: Syyskausi avattu myös @Poltalous-podcastissa. @biosresearch-tutkijat @TTToivanen ja Paavo Järvensivu vieraina puhumassa mm. vi…
-
One Comment
In ancient Rome the publisher – the copier – did not pay the poet anything. If something was “printed” on paper – i.e. carved, copied, or written on a piece of material – that which was on that material was looked upon as belonging to the owner of that material. Thus, the poet starved.
Post a Comment