At worst “intellectual property” produces nice paradoxes. Like this one: “Scientist has to pay to access his own paper“. The irony is thick when it turns out that when the paper left the scientist’s table, it was licensed with a Creative Commons license.
- RT @jrockstrom: EU carbon neutral by 2050. China carbon neutral before 2060. Not bad. Biden in office and the world may tip for good https:…
- RT @Jussi_T_Eronen: Nyt alkaa näyttää käyrät oikeilta! https://t.co/o34uzAUVYY
- RT @mustapipa: Voidaan sanoa, että hyvinvoinnin, luonnon ja ympäristön huomioivat kestävän kehityksen indeksit eivät seuraa BKT:n kehitystä…
-
One Comment
In ancient Rome the publisher – the copier – did not pay the poet anything. If something was “printed” on paper – i.e. carved, copied, or written on a piece of material – that which was on that material was looked upon as belonging to the owner of that material. Thus, the poet starved.
Post a Comment