Comments on: Roman Empire & dynamic modelling http://nuvatsia.terevaden.net/2009/07/23/roman-empire-dynamic-modelling/ Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:27:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: tere http://nuvatsia.terevaden.net/2009/07/23/roman-empire-dynamic-modelling/comment-page-1/#comment-46905 tere Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:49:02 +0000 http://nuvatsia.terevaden.net/?p=731#comment-46905 what does lower complexity imply, then? in any case, i agree that there are several different issues entangled here. see this comment and subcomments to Bardi's article: http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/5528#comment-522110 what does lower complexity imply, then?

in any case, i agree that there are several different issues entangled here. see this comment and subcomments to Bardi’s article:

http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/5528#comment-522110

]]> By: matti http://nuvatsia.terevaden.net/2009/07/23/roman-empire-dynamic-modelling/comment-page-1/#comment-46867 matti Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:31:35 +0000 http://nuvatsia.terevaden.net/?p=731#comment-46867 I wrote a wrong website link on my comment above because I instinctually wrote blogspot.com instead of wordpress.com (I used blogger for too many years). If you decide to allow my comment above, you could also change the website into: http://www.madonluvut.wordpress.com As an aside, you might wonder why I'm always criticizing your points of view here. As a matter of fact I always find your writings eye-opening and worth serious rethinking of my own preconceptions. But I think there's no need to seek any theoretical unification, theoretical anarchy should involve so many discussions going forth to undiscovered countries, white spaces of political maps. I wrote a wrong website link on my comment above because I instinctually wrote blogspot.com instead of wordpress.com (I used blogger for too many years). If you decide to allow my comment above, you could also change the website into:
http://www.madonluvut.wordpress.com

As an aside, you might wonder why I’m always criticizing your points of view here. As a matter of fact I always find your writings eye-opening and worth serious rethinking of my own preconceptions. But I think there’s no need to seek any theoretical unification, theoretical anarchy should involve so many discussions going forth to undiscovered countries, white spaces of political maps.

]]> By: matti http://nuvatsia.terevaden.net/2009/07/23/roman-empire-dynamic-modelling/comment-page-1/#comment-46845 matti Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:20:44 +0000 http://nuvatsia.terevaden.net/?p=731#comment-46845 "So the “controlled collapse” is equal to “lower complexity” is equal to “anarchy”, right?" Sounds like equivocation, lower complexity does not imply anarchy. Anarchy, however, might always imply lower complexity. This is because anarchy seems to require less social and professional specialisation. I've never heard about high tech anarchy. “So the “controlled collapse” is equal to “lower complexity” is equal to “anarchy”, right?”

Sounds like equivocation, lower complexity does not imply anarchy. Anarchy, however, might always imply lower complexity. This is because anarchy seems to require less social and professional specialisation. I’ve never heard about high tech anarchy.

]]>