At worst “intellectual property” produces nice paradoxes. Like this one: “Scientist has to pay to access his own paper“. The irony is thick when it turns out that when the paper left the scientist’s table, it was licensed with a Creative Commons license.
identi.ca- tereensio: Now out in CTheory, "Oil and the Regime of Capitalism: Questions to Philosophers of the Future" http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=658 September 3, 2010
- tereensio: uusi niin & näin 2/10; extramatskut netissä: http://www.netn.fi/lehti/niin-nain-210 September 3, 2010
- tereensio: Bruttokansanonnellisuus ja koulutus Bhutanissa http://global.finland.fi/Public/default.aspx?contentid=194376 September 3, 2010
- tereensio: great interview with Graeber on banks, anarchism, capitalism http://tiny.cc/ws05c September 3, 2010
- tereensio: The Piratebay to be hosted by the Swedish Pirate Party http://press.piratpartiet.se/2010/05/18/piratpartiet-levererar-pirate-bays-bandbredd/ September 3, 2010
Podcast Feeds
One Comment
In ancient Rome the publisher – the copier – did not pay the poet anything. If something was “printed” on paper – i.e. carved, copied, or written on a piece of material – that which was on that material was looked upon as belonging to the owner of that material. Thus, the poet starved.
Post a Comment