At worst “intellectual property” produces nice paradoxes. Like this one: “Scientist has to pay to access his own paper“. The irony is thick when it turns out that when the paper left the scientist’s table, it was licensed with a Creative Commons license.
-
twitter- tereensio: @kyyberi Congrats! February 10, 2012
- tereensio: My spring seminar in Helsinki will be on "Art and truth in a time of crisis". Lots of Foucault, I think. C u there! http://t.co/vrk4P1f1 February 6, 2012
- tereensio: RT @EDUSKUNTAVAALIT: Kansainväliset suurpankit ovat kriisin kuluessakin rahastaneet kriisimaista satojen miljardien korkotulot. Sinä mak ... February 5, 2012
- tereensio: Varoufakis on Common Mistakes of EuroCrisis Reporting http://t.co/ImjdasXc February 4, 2012
- tereensio: Slovenia's ambassador apologizes to children and nation for signing ACTA, calls for mass demonstrations in Ljubljana http://t.co/eTgJzJeL February 3, 2012
- identi.ca
- tereensio: Graeber on Adam Smith & Austrian economics: http://ur1.ca/784ng January 4, 2012
- tereensio: Go, neutrinos, go! I know you can make it in 0,00239! November 19, 2011
- tereensio: Barroso: "We are in a defining moment where we either unite or face irrelevance" Ok, so, how do I vote for irrelevancy, please? November 10, 2011
- tereensio: Europe: meet the new boss (same as the old): Jin Liqun, Europe induces 'sloth, indolence' - Al Jazeera English http://ur1.ca/5ohm2 November 7, 2011
- tereensio: We are here: Hubbert's third prediction http://ur1.ca/5nfyp November 5, 2011
Podcast Feeds
One Comment
In ancient Rome the publisher – the copier – did not pay the poet anything. If something was “printed” on paper – i.e. carved, copied, or written on a piece of material – that which was on that material was looked upon as belonging to the owner of that material. Thus, the poet starved.
Post a Comment